![]() When comparing crash test ratings from NHTSA, both the Honda Fit and the Mazda CX-3 have the same average safety rating of 5 out of 5 Stars. The Mazda CX-3, a crossover/subcompact SUV, has the advantage in the areas of front leg room cargo space. We compare four 2017 compact hatchbacks to find out who does it bestChevy Cruze, Honda Civic Sport, Mazda 3, and Volkswagen Golf. The Honda Fit, a subcompact car, has the advantage of offering more interior volume, reflected in more front head room, front shoulder room, rear head room, rear shoulder room and rear leg room. Both the Fit and the CX-3 are rated to deliver an average of 31 miles per gallon, with highway ranges of 382 and 432 miles respectively. For reference, the 2001 MAZDA Protege originally had a starting sticker price of 14,095, with the range-topping Protege MP3 Sedan 4D starting at 18,500. Engine Power and Fuel Efficiency Comparisonįor engine performance, the Honda Fit’s base engine makes 130 horsepower, and the Mazda CX-3 base engine makes 148 horsepower. This gives the Honda Fit an advantage in reliability compared to the Mazda CX-3. For the Mazda CX-3 the reliability rating is 6.1 out of 10. Reasons: Better build quality - was more solid and passed the 'door close test' (the sound of closing the door was more solid and less tinny. Based on my experience, I'd recommend the Honda Fit. ![]() The Mazda 2 was an automatic, the Fit a manual. ISeeCars’ Reliability Rating for the Honda Fit is 8.6 out of 10. I logged about 400 miles on the Mazda 2, and about 220 on the Honda Fit. This results in the Honda Fit being ranked 1 out of 28 Best Hatchbacks and the Mazda CX-3 being ranked 2 out of 20 Best Subcompact SUVs. The iSeeCars Overall Quality rating for the Honda Fit is 9.3 out of 10 while the Mazda CX-3's quality rating is 8.2 out of 10. This means the Honda Fit retains 5.8 percentage points more of its value and has the advantage of higher resale value versus the Mazda CX-3. Looking at the 5-year depreciation rate for both models, the Honda Fit loses 29.8 percent of its value and the Mazda CX-3 loses 35.6 percent of its value. Based on this comparison of the Honda Fit's and the Mazda CX-3's specifications and ratings, the Honda Fit is a better car than the Mazda CX-3.Ī used 2020 Honda Fit ranges from $17,163 to $24,000 while a used 2020 Mazda CX-3 is priced between $18,245 to $23,997. 'Better made and better handling, better storage, can fit 5 comfortably and its a Honda.' 'Its a better car and worth any price differece.' 'The renegade is a piece of junk. The Honda Fit and Mazda CX-3 have the same fuel efficiency. User Reviews Reviews from CarGurus users who have driven or owned the car. The Mazda CX-3 has the advantage in the area of base engine power. ![]() When comparing the Honda Fit's and the Mazda CX-3's specifications and ratings, the Honda Fit has the advantage in the areas of typical lower range of pricing for one- to five-year-old used cars, reliability, resale value, interior volume and overall quality score.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |